CVS Pharmacy Lawsuits

CVS is one of the largest retail pharmacy chains in the United States. There are hundreds of CVS pharmacy stores in Maryland, Washington DC, and Virginia,  plus thousands more across the country.  Baltimore is loaded with CVS pharmacies.  Each CVS location has a multipart business: a pharmacy that fills prescription medications and a retail store that sells over-the-counter health products and a variety of other convenience items.

Tort lawsuits against CVS tend to reflect this 2-part business model. Tort lawsuits against CVS tend to fall into 2 general categories, each of which relates to a different part of the CVS business: (1) premises liability or “slip and fall” suits, and  (2) malpractice suits for medication errors.

This page will look at both of these common types of lawsuits against CVS. We will discuss your chances of winning or getting a settlement in a lawsuit against CVS, and we will look at the average settlement value of CVS lawsuits.

CVS Premises Liability (Slip and Fall) Lawsuits

Premises liability refers to lawsuits against property owners by people who are injured by some sort of hazardous condition (e.g., wet floor) on the premises. These are often referred to as “slip and fall” cases. Lawsuits by customers against retail stores (such as Target or Walmart) are the most common type of premises liability case.

All CVS locations have significant retail shopping store components. The CVS retail stores are very high-volume with lots of individual customers conducting numerous small transactions. Compared to other retailers like Home Depot, CVS retail stores do not have any particularly hazardous features or potentially deadly merchandise.

However, busy CVS locations can often be host to a large number of customers going in and out daily. This level of inbound and outbound customer traffic alone puts CVS at risk so it is not surprising that premises liability is the most common type of tort action that CVS defends. In fact, CVS defends 4 times as many “slip and fall” or premises liability lawsuits as it does prescription error lawsuits.

CVS Medication Error Lawsuits

CVS stores fill over a billion medication prescriptions every year across the U.S. When filling prescriptions, CVS pharmacies as functioning as healthcare providers which means they can be sued for medical malpractice. Malpractice lawsuits against CVS always involve some type of prescription medication error. Medication negligence by pharmacies falls into one of two major subtypes: (1) dispensing the wrong drug; and (2) harmful drug interactions.

High-volume pharmacies like CVS make drug dispensing or prescription filling errors a lot more frequently than most people would think. Drug dispensing errors can include situations where the pharmacy dispenses the wrong medication (i.e., a completely different medication than what the prescription calls for). Another common error involves dispensing the wrong dose (e.g., giving 100mg pills instead of 10mg pills).

These sorts of filling mistakes happen a lot, but 9 times out of 10 the error is relatively harmless. Even if the pharmacy gives you the wrong drug or the wrong dose it is usually not going to hurt or kill you. When dispensing errors do cause actual harm or adverse side effects, they are often short-lived and no permanent injuries are involved.

Most prescription error cases against CVS involve situations where the wrong drug results in a few days or weeks of physical distress and maybe a short hospital stay with no long-lasting health consequences. As a result, these cases tend to have a lower value.

CVS Opioid Lawsuits

CVS, along with other major pharmacy chains like Walgreens and Walmart, has faced numerous lawsuits related to the opioid crisis in the United States. These lawsuits allege that CVS contributed to the widespread misuse of opioids by failing to monitor suspicious prescriptions, failing to enforce safeguards, and contributing to excessive distribution of opioids, thus fueling the epidemic.

Thousands of lawsuits have been filed by states, counties, cities, and tribal governments. Plaintiffs argue that CVS and other pharmacies played a critical role in the opioid crisis by not adequately tracking, reporting, or limiting excessive prescriptions. Some cases even assert that CVS and other companies prioritized profits over public safety.

In 2022, CVS announced a proposed settlement of around $5 billion over a 10-year period to resolve most of its opioid-related lawsuits. This settlement is part of a broader agreement involving other major pharmacy chains. Despite the settlement, CVS and other pharmacy chains still face ongoing lawsuits in some jurisdictions.

Common Types of CVS Medication Negligence

Medication error malpractice by pharmacies can occur in various ways, often due to negligence, oversight, or miscommunication. Here are the common types:

Dispensing the Wrong Medication: This occurs when a pharmacy provides a patient with a medication different from the one prescribed by the healthcare provider. A common example would be if a patient is prescribed an antibiotic, but the pharmacy dispenses an antihistamine instead. Look-Alike, Sound-Alike (LASA) Errors are often involved when this happens.

Incorrect Dosage Dispensing: The pharmacy dispenses the right medication but at the wrong dosage—either too much or too little. For example, if a prescription calls for 50 mg tablets, but the pharmacy dispenses 100 mg tablets.

Wrong Instructions on Label: The pharmacy provides incorrect usage instructions on the medication label, which could lead to improper use of the drug. For instance, the label instructs the patient to take the medication once a day instead of twice a day, as prescribed.

 

CVS Settlements and Verdicts

Below are summaries of lawsuits against CVS that resulted in jury verdicts or settlements that were publicly reported. These cases include both premises liability and medication error claims. Keep in mind that the cases below are just a small, limited sampling of CVS lawsuits because they do not include cases or claims that were settled confidentially.

• Plaintiff v CVS Health Corp (New Jersey 2024) $24,000: The plaintiff, a minor, was being treated with Focalin XR 15 mg capsules, as prescribed by his doctor, for his ADHD. The plaintiff alleged that CVS erroneously substituted a generic medication, Dextroamphetamine, for the Focalin prescribed to him, without the knowledge or consent of the plaintiff, the plaintiff’s parents, or the plaintiff’s physicians. The plaintiff claimed that he went to the emergency room as a result of this drug dispensing error. The plaintiff reportedly suffered heart palpitations, tachycardia, and sleeplessness.
• Plaintiff v CVS Pharmacy (Nevada 2023) $31,000: The plaintiff, a middle school-aged male, went to CVS to get his prescription for generic Adderall filled for treatment of his ADHD condition. The CVS pharmacy accidentally misfilled the prescription with methadone, a drug used to treat opioid dependency. The plaintiff only took the methadone 1 or 2 times.
• Wallace v CVS Pharmacy (Alabama 2021) $50,000: A boy was prescribed 2 mg of Baclofen. CVS dispensed 2.5 ml instead, which is a higher dose. The boy suffered lethargy, disorientation, an altered mental status, nausea, and vomiting. He also suffered the aggravation of his developmental delays and pre-existing neurological issues. His issues were resolved after 30 days. The boy’s mother alleged that CVS’s failure to dispense the right dosage caused his injuries. This case settled for $50,000.
• J.L., Pro Ami v CVS Pharmacy (New York 2019) $40,000: A 7-year-old boy suffered an infection. He was prescribed Azithromycin. CVS dispensed Alendronate, also known as Fosamax, instead. The boy suffered respiratory and gastrointestinal issues, including vomiting and shortness of breath. His parents alleged that CVS’s failure to dispense the right medication caused his injuries. The defense denied liability. This case settled for $40,000.
• Marrone v CVS Pharmacy (California 2018) $2.5 million: plaintiff, 57-year-old female, is walking up ramped entrance to CVS Pharmacy when she trips and violently falls over a metal stub sticking out of the concrete with duct tape on it. The stub was a remnant of a metal signpost that had previously been removed. Plaintiff did not request an ambulance or medical treatment immediately after her fall, but the following day she complained of pain all over her body and particularly in her left wrist. She went to a doctor and was diagnosed with herniated lumbar discs at L4-5 and L5-S1 with annular fissures, and osteophytes, or bone spurs, at C5-6 and C6-7, resulting in disc osteophyte complex. Over the next 2 years, she undergoes numerous back surgeries and incurs medical expenses of over $400k. The defense admits liability – how could they not? – but contests the extent of the plaintiff’s injuries in her CVS pharmacy lawsuit.  The jury sided with the victim and awarded $2.5 million.
• Katz v CVS Pharmacy (California 2017) $1.1 million: the female plaintiff is shopping at a CVS store when a store employee strikes her with a heavy metal shopping cart full of stock items. The impact knocks the plaintiff over and she hits her head on a shelf and suffers a traumatic brain injury with white matter damage to her cerebellum with permanent cognitive impairment. She also suffers cervical back strain and shoulder damage. CVS denies liability claiming that the plaintiff’s own negligence was a contributing factor to the incident and denying that plaintiff hit her head on the shelf as alleged. Jury awards $1,190,000 in damages including $550k for pain and suffering + $300k for future medical expenses.
• Redmond v CVS Pharmacy (Texas 2017) $202,500: 61-year-old male plaintiff walks into a CVS store to pick up his prescription. The store was not officially open yet but doors were unlocked and it appeared to be o
  pen for business. Contractors were inside the store installing shelving and electrical wiring. Plaintiff was told the store was closed so he starts walking back out when a large roll of electrical conduit falls on him and knocks him down. He suffers a complex hip fracture requiring surgical repair with plates and screws and sues CVS and contractors for premises liability. Cases eventually settles for $202,500 with CVS paying for most of the settlement.
• Kadar v CVS Pharmacy (Indiana 2013) $455,563: the female customer is walking into a CVS store when she slips and falls on accumulated snow and ice in front of the building. She breaks her right leg and ankle in the fall and has to undergo several surgeries to repair the injuries. She sues CVS for premises liability but CVS denies liability claiming that its snow removal contractor had cleared the walkway shortly before the incident. The jury awards the plaintiff $455k in damages.
• Thompson v CVS Pharmacy (Oklahoma 2013) $460,000: the plaintiff is driving past a CVS store in Oklahoma City when his car skids on a patch of black ice, rolls over and slams into oncoming traffic. She suffers moderate head injuries and a ruptured lumbar disc at L4/L5 which requires her to undergo spinal fusion surgery. She sues CVS alleging that the source of the black ice was a water leak coming from the CVS store near the intersection. CVS denies knowing of the leak but at trial, the store’s assistant manager admits that they were aware of the leak and had actually taken some steps to fix it. The jury awards $460,000 which includes punitive damages.
• Parker v CVS Pharmacy (Alabama 2011) $165,000: plaintiff’s family doctor prescribes her a combination of two antibiotics, sulfamethoxazole, and trimethoprim. She goes to CVS to have the prescription filled and they mistakenly give her hydroxyzine, an antihistamine slightly stronger than Benadryl. She suffers an acute allergic reaction to the antihistamine and goes to the hospital with uncontrollable shaking. She is released from the hospital a few hours later but she claims that the reaction causes her various medical problems over the following 2 years including swelling in her hands and wrists, fatigue, leg pain, vaginal bleeding, and other issues. CVS admits that it negligently filled her prescription but disputes the extent of her alleged damages. Jury awards $165,000.
• Nussbaum v CVS Inc. (Virginia 2011) $1.15 million: plaintiff’s doctor calls in a prescription for Bactrim DC to the CVS pharmacy in Great Falls, VA. Plaintiff was already taking a blood thinner drug, Coumadin, which was contra-indicated with Bactrim because of a potentially dangerous interaction. Within 2 days the interaction between the drugs causes the plaintiff to suffer uncontrolled internal bleeding and she dies soon after. (There are many pharmacy drug interaction lawsuits involving this Bactrim/Coumadin.) Her family sues both CVS and the doctors for wrongful death, alleging that they were negligent in prescribing and filling a prescription for a contra-indicated drug. CVS paid $950,000 to settle the medication error claims against it and the doctors paid $200,000.
• Molettiere v CVS Pharmacy (Pennsylvania 2011) $250,000: plaintiff slips and falls on unremoved snow and ice directly outside the entrance to a CVS store in Montgomery County, PA. She suffers back and neck injuries and sues CVS and a snow removal contractor for premises liability. The snow removal contractor settles out and the case proceeds against CVS. The jury awards $250,000 in damages.
• Ostrow v CVS Pharmacy (Connecticut 2006) $387,500: 77-year-old man suffers an adverse reaction to the prescription drug Biaxin which was filled by CVS. He sues CVS alleging that the pharmacy failed to properly review his list of current medications and failed to warn him of a potentially dangerous interaction with his blood pressure medication, Zocor. The jury awards $387,500 in damages even though the plaintiff’s injuries were apparently not permanent.
• Chachad v CVS Pharmacy (Georgia 2004) $115,000: middle-aged female plaintiff receives a new prescription from her doctor for Glucotrol for the management of her diabetes condition. CVS incorrectly fills the prescription with a blood thinner drug called Coumadin. Plaintiff takes the wrong medication for a month before undergoing planned surgery on her knee. After knee surgery plaintiff experiences excessive bleeding and vomiting at which point doctors discover the medication error by CVS. The drug she got from CVS made her blood too thin requiring two days of hospitalization with coagulation therapy, but no long-term injuries. CVS blames the mistake on the doctor’s office but the jury ultimately finds CVS responsible and awards $115,000 in damages. This case would have been worth much more if a medication error had caused permanent injuries.

Hire a Lawyer for your CVS Lawsuit

If you have a potential lawsuit against CVS in the Baltimore-Washington area for premises liability, medication error, or something else you need an experienced, respected personal injury firm in your corner. CVS is a huge corporation with billions in annual revenues so you can expect them to pay out top dollar to defend your claim.

The lawyers at Miller & Zois have expertise in both prescription medication errors and premises liability lawsuits. Contact us today at 800-553-8082 or contact us online.